Abstract
Although often taking part in seminars and workshops on how to teach English to their students, it seems that elementary school teachers of English (though not all) do not really implement what they have received in their classrooms. The seminar that the English Department of Widya Mandala Surabaya Catholic University held on the 8th of August 2015 was a workshop where the participants, the elementary school teachers of English, were trained to demonstrate how to use drama, storytelling, games and songs as techniques in teaching English to their students. They were expected to be able to use these techniques in their respective classrooms. The techniques became the alternatives to the current techniques being practiced at schools to enliven the learning atmosphere. Therefore, this study which is the third level or the last level of our project on developing an English handbook for English teachers at elementary schools, is in the form of an observational study describing how the teachers implemented the techniques -- drama, storytelling, games and songs -- in their respective classrooms, students’ responses and what problems took place when the teachers were carrying out the techniques. The results show that the teachers were able to teach those techniques in their classes, students actively took part more actively in their English class, and they liked games and songs much.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Burnett, G. (1995). Overcrowding in urban schools. ERIC/CUE Digest Number, 107, 1-6.
Earthman, G. I. (2002). School Facility Conditions and Student Academic Achievement. UCLA: 's Institute for Democracy, Education, and Access. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5sw56439
Emmer, E. T., & Stough, L. M. (2001). Classroom management: A critical part of educational psychology, with implications for teacher education. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 103-112.
Englehart, J. M. (2011). Why class size effects cannot stand alone: Insights from a qualitative exploration. Learning Environments Research, 14(2), 109-121.
Finn, J. D., Pannozzo, G. M., & Achilles, C. M. (2003). The "why's" of class size: Student behavior in small classes. Review of Educational Research, 73(3), 321-368.
Harbaugh, A. G., & Cavanagh, R. F. (2012). Associations between the Classroom Learning Environment and Student Engagement in Learning 2: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach. Australian Association for Research in Education (NJ1).
Нажимов, А. (2019). ИНДОЕВРОПЕЙСКАЯ ЗАИМСТВОВАНИЯ В ОБЩЕСТВЕННО-ПОЛИТИЧЕСКОЙ ЛЕКСИКЕ В КАРАКАЛПАКСКОМ ЯЗЫКЕ. Материалы. ІІІ Международной научно-практической интернет-конференции «Наука и образование в ХХІ веке», 249-251.
Нажимов, А. (2018). ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ СЛОВ ОБЩЕСТВЕННО-ПОЛИТИЧЕСКОЙ ЛЕКСИА КАРАКАЛПАКСКОГО ЯЗЫКА С АФФИКСАМИ –ЛЫҚ//-ЛИК, ШЫЛЫҚ//-ШИЛИК, -СЫЗЛЫҚ//-СИЗЛИК. «Білім саласындағы рухани жаңғыру мәселелері» атты Халықаралық ғылыми-тәжірибелік конференцияның материалдары, 41-46.
Нажимов, А. (2015). ТҮРКИЙ ЖАЗБА ЕСТЕЛИКЛЕРИНДЕ СИЯСЫЙ-ЖӘМИЙЕТЛИК ЛЕКСИКАНЫҢ ҚОЛЛАНЫЎЫ. Халық аўызеки дөретиўшилиги миллий ҳәм улыўма инсаный қәдириятлар системасында. (Халық аралық илмий конференция материаллари), 118-119.
Нажимов, А. (2013). ҚАРАҚАЛПАҚ ТИЛИНИҢ ЖӘМИЙЕТЛИК-СИЯСИЙ ЛЕКСИКАСЫНЫҢ РАЎАЖЛАНЫЎЫ. Магистрантлардың илимий мийнетлериниң топламы, 185-188.
Нажимов, А. (2013). ҲӘЗИРГИ ҚАРАҚАЛПАҚ ТИЛИНДЕ ЖӘМИЙЕТЛИК-СИЯСИЙ ЛЕКСИКАНЫ ҮЙРЕНИЎ ЗӘРҮРЛИГИ. Ha’zirgi filologiya iliminin’ a’miyetli ma’seleleri, 49-52.